Reports Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission |
||
Report of the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry of Manitoba
|
Chapter EightAboriginal Employment and Participation in the Justice SystemThe Aboriginal Justice Inquiry placed a heavy emphasis on the need to employ more Aboriginal people in every part of the existing justice system. The AJI argued that: because of their almost complete absence other than as accused, the system is now considered to be a foreign and uncaring one by Aboriginal people…We are satisfied that if there were Aboriginal people working in the legal system, there would be a greater understanding of the problems faced by Aboriginal accused, victims, witnesses and their families, and higher levels of assistance and advice. Aboriginal communities would benefit economically and socially from having people within their community who hold positions of importance within the justice system. (AJI, Volume I, page 663) The AJI suggested that job descriptions for positions that required, or that will inevitably result in, high contact with Aboriginal people should place greater emphasis on the applicant's knowledge and skills in the area of Aboriginal skills and languages. It suggested that such positions should be designated as "Aboriginal Bilingual Positions" within government, much as the government now designates some positions as "Bilingual" for purposes of its French language policy. The AJI indicated it was not impressed with the results achieved under voluntary affirmative action programs, noting that there were few consequences for managers who failed to achieve progress in hiring members of target groups under these programs. For this reason the AJI stated that the government needed to
The AJI recommended the creation of an Employment Equity Commission (EEC) to serve as an enforcement agency. While it placed no limit on the authority of the EEC, it recommended that its initial efforts be directed towards increasing Aboriginal employment in the justice system. The AJI also addressed the issues of targets. It concluded that the minimum target in the justice system ought to be the percentage of Aboriginal people in the Manitoba population, while the optimum target would be the percentage of Aboriginal people served by the justice system. Since the AJI estimated that Aboriginal people constituted 12 percent of the Manitoba population, it recommended a minimum of 12 percent and an optimum that would vary with the number of Aboriginal people being served by a specific branch of government. The AJI made the following specific recommendations dealing with employment equity.
In addition, the AJI made the following recommendations that address the issue of Aboriginal employment in various branches of the justice system.
Manitoba Justice Department
Legal Aid
Correctional Facilities
Police
Legal training
Aboriginal Employment in the Justice SystemGovernment of ManitobaIn 1983 the Manitoba government adopted an employment equity policy. This policy identified four target groups that, in the opinion of the government of the day, had been the victims of systemic discrimination in employment and were, therefore, underrepresented in the Manitoba government workforce. The target groups were women, Aboriginal people, visible minorities, and persons with disabilities. Under this policy the government committed to continuing to hire the most capable job applicants, but when applicants were of equal capability, the government would hire the applicant from the target group. The policy's goal was to create a civil service more reflective of the broader society; that goal would be achieved when the percentage of women, Aboriginal people, members of visible minorities, and persons with disabilities employed by the government was equal to their presence in the Manitoba population. When the program was established in 1983, its goal for the year 2003 was 50 percent for women, 10 percent for Aboriginal people, 7 percent for persons with disabilities, and 6 percent for visible minorities. This policy has remained in place since 1983. The AJI's proposed employment equity legislation was never adopted, and the Employment Equity Commission was not created. Progress towards the government's goals has been different for different target groups. In 1987 women accounted for 45.6 percent of the civil service; in 2000, they accounted for 49.58 percent. In 1987 Aboriginal people accounted for 2.01 percent of the civil service, in 2000, they accounted for 7.3 percent of the civil service. However, when one subtracts seasonal and part-time Aboriginal employees of the Conservation Department, this figure drops to 6 percent. Persons with disabilities accounted for 2.01 percent of the civil service in 1987 and 2.5 percent in 2000. Visible minorities accounted for 2.26 percent of the civil service in 1987 and 2.84 percent in 2000. While there has been an increase of over 100 percent of Aboriginal people within the Manitoba civil service over the past 13 years, it is apparent that the government will not reach its 10 percent goal in 2003. Furthermore, the rapid growth in the Aboriginal population over the past decade suggests that a 10 percent target may be too low in light of the government's original goals for the program. The hiring of Aboriginal people has progressed at different rates in different departments. For example, 30 percent of Northern Affairs employees were Aboriginal in 2000, while 4.7 percent of the Civil Service Commission (the body ultimately charged with overseeing the employment equity policy) was Aboriginal. In 2000 Aboriginal people accounted for 8.53 percent of the people working for Justice, 8.8 percent of the people working for Health, and 8 percent of the people working for Family Services. Information provided by the Manitoba government in February 2001 indicated that Aboriginal people accounted for 10.4 percent of the employees in the Department of Justice. From this it would appear that Justice has achieved the employment equity targets established in 1983 and is close to achieving the AJI's minimum goal. There are a number of potential explanations for the failure of the program to reach its overall goals. One of these is the fact that during the past decade, there has been no growth in the size of the civil service. A period of protracted restraint and devolution has created a situation where the Manitoba civil service is smaller than it was in 1987. The continued social issues that Aboriginal communities face have also played an unfortunate role in reducing the number of potential job applicants from the Aboriginal community. Poor housing, poor infant health, and diminished educational opportunities all combine to limit the number of Aboriginal people who possess the qualifications required to compete for certain government positions. This issue is discussed at length elsewhere in this report, but it worth emphasizing that policies that focus on supporting families, young people, and communities are the needed foundation for success in meeting other goals, such as an increase in Aboriginal employment. Increase in the availability of childcare is also needed to allow Aboriginal people to participate in the labour force in greater numbers. Once these comments have been taken into account, the fact remains that the minimum goal set by the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry ten years ago has not been attained in the Department of Justice, nor has it been attained across the civil service. Finally, it must be noted that the major AJI initiative that had been recommended for this area has not been implemented. One is drawn back to the AJI observation on the lack of consequences for failing to meet employment equity goals, and how this reflected a lack of government commitment.
PoliceManitoba police forces have experienced more success than the Manitoba government in increasing the number of Aboriginal people it has recruited and retained. For example:
The progress made by police departments, during a time when they were experiencing the same economic pressures as the Manitoba government, suggests that political will, manifested by aggressive recruiting, training, and retention programs, can lead to improved results when it comes to Aboriginal employment.
The Approach of the Aboriginal Justice Implementation CommissionThe Commission is in agreement with the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry's emphasis on the need for greater Aboriginal employment in the justice system. Increased numbers of Aboriginal people employed in a system that deals with large numbers of Aboriginal people will improve the system's credibility and legitimacy among Aboriginal people. Secondly, an increase in Aboriginal people working in the justice system is the best way to ensure that justice services are being provided in a manner that is culturally appropriate. This will improve communication and understanding between those who are administering justice and those Aboriginal people who find their lives being administered by the justice system. This will render the system more efficient and more effective. It would also create role models for young Aboriginal people and, more immediately, create economic opportunities for Aboriginal persons. The Commission recognizes that while there has been an improvement in Aboriginal employment in the justice system, the minimal goals set by the Manitoba government in 1983 and the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry in 1991 have not been met. The question that remains is how to achieve those goals. The AJIC has reviewed literature on efforts to increase Aboriginal employment and has commissioned its own research on the topic. It is clear that a process that simply posts job notices in the traditional fashion and waits for Aboriginal candidates to apply will not make considerable progress on this issue.
Trends in Public-Sector EmploymentThe last decade has been a period of public-sector contraction. The Commission notes that the downsizing of the Manitoba civil service over the past decade has had a number of detrimental effects on Aboriginal people that go beyond the government's difficulties in meeting employment goals. The impacts of downsizing and restraint policies have fallen heavily on services and programs that address the needs of Aboriginal people, whether or not they are involved in the justice system. Child and family service workers, Legal Aid lawyers, public school teachers, and probation officers--to name only a few of the workers who provide crucial services to Aboriginal people--carry larger caseloads than they did a decade ago and often find themselves working with fewer resources. To the degree that they have placed more young Aboriginal people at risk of coming into conflict with the law, reduced the system's ability to aid Aboriginal people who are in trouble, and limited employment opportunities, such policies of public-sector contraction have frustrated the spirit and intent of the AJI report. For a variety of reasons, it appears that the opportunity exists to reverse these trends. Demographics are creating the opportunity for a renewal of the public sector. It is anticipated that over the next five years, approximately 2000 positions will become available with the Manitoba government as the result of retirements (Anokiiwin Employment Solutions, page 20). Coupled with the types of investments in prevention that are described elsewhere in this report, there will be significant opportunities to hire Aboriginal people in the public sector. There is also a growing number of Aboriginal people entering the labour market each year; currently, Aboriginal persons account for one in four new members of the labour force.
ConclusionThe Aboriginal Justice Implementation Committee endorses the goals of the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry for increased hiring of Aboriginal persons. The AJIC applauds those agencies that have achieved significant increases in employment. It would appear that those improvements are the result of management's commitment to improve recruiting, enhance training opportunities, remove barriers to employment, and enhance retention. The AJIC believes these measures offer the most effective tools to increase Aboriginal employment. While there may well be merit to an enforcement mechanism, such as an employment equity commission, the AJIC is mindful of the need to invest resources in as effective a manner as possible. For that reason, the AJIC is not recommending that such a commission be established at this time. Therefore, the Commission is not prepared to recommend a legislated employment equity act or employment equity commission. However, it does endorse the employment goals set out by the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry. These goals should guide the planning, monitoring, and evaluation of an Aboriginal Employment Strategy. The Commission also notes that Manitoba Conservation has recently adopted an Aboriginal Employment Strategy. This strategy stresses the importance of:
Anokiiwin Employment Solutions prepared a paper for the Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission, entitled Aboriginal Employment Strategy (which is available on the AJIC website), that makes many of these points, as well. The rationale for implementing such a strategy in the Justice department are as clear as they were in 1991:
There are, as noted above, two additional reasons why the government should act on this measure immediately:
RecommendationsThe Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission recommends that:
The Commission believes the employment strategy should incorporate the following elements:
AppointmentsOfficers of the CourtSeveral important roles in the Manitoba justice system are filled by individuals who are appointees with varying degrees of independence, and are appointed through various processes. These include Provincial Court judges, magistrates, hearing officers, masters, and referees. For the same arguments advanced in the above section on the need for an Aboriginal hiring strategy, there are good public policy reasons for ensuring that a significant number of these positions are held by Aboriginal people. The Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission recommends that:
Board and CommissionsThe lives of Aboriginal people are affected by a wide range of provincial government boards and commissions. The AJIC recommends that the same hiring goals endorsed by the AJI--namely no less than the percentage of Aboriginal people in Manitoba and, optimally, a number equal to the percentage of Aboriginal people served by a department and its agencies--be applied to appointments to government boards and commissions. The board that has the most significance in the administration of justice is the Board of Directors of Legal Aid Manitoba. The fact that a significant percentage of the Legal Aid Manitoba clientele are Aboriginal led the AJIC to write to the Minister of Justice in January 2001, recommending that "there be a significant number of Aboriginal directors." The Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission recommends that:
An Aboriginal Justice CollegeThe Aboriginal Justice Inquiry recommendations called for a significant increase in the number of Aboriginal people working in the Manitoba justice system. The Inquiry recognized that dedicated efforts would be needed to ensure a trained workforce prepared to take on these positions. For this reason, the AJI made the following recommendations:
The AJIC is also recommending a significant increase in the number of Aboriginal people employed in the justice system, and recognizes the need for specific training opportunities for Aboriginal people. Manitoba Education and Training prepared a discussion paper for the AJIC on this topic. The paper, which is available on the AJIC website, lists four options. 1. A College established by provincial legislation An Aboriginal Justice College established under the provincial Council on Post-Secondary Education Act could:
2. An affiliated college/technical training institute A free-standing Aboriginal Justice College could have a formal affiliation relationship with an existing college or university. The college would be:
Formal affiliation would address issues such as broad program accreditation, and joint development and delivery partnerships. Examples of this kind of approach in a Canadian context include the Saskatchewan Indian Federated College, which is affiliated with the University of Regina. 3. An Institute within an existing educational institution An Aboriginal Justice Institute could operate within an existing college. Such an approach could be:
This model would provide less independence in governance and autonomy. 4. A virtual Aboriginal Justice College Under this proposal there would be no physical college. Instead, an Aboriginal Justice College or Authority could be established, with the following features:
This type of model would involve no formal academic/educational standing. As a result, the opportunity for independent action and autonomy would arguably be somewhat reduced.
The Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission recommends that:
Law SchoolAccording to the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry in 1991, only ten Aboriginal lawyers were practising law in Manitoba. To address this issue, the AJI made the following recommendations:
The Dean of the University of Manitoba Law School, prior to the report's being issued, had determined that a more strategic initiative was required to increase the numbers of Aboriginal students in the law school. With this view, the faculty established a program for the recruitment and support of Aboriginal students. The Academic Support Program is in its eleventh year and has witnessed a significant increase in the number of students entering law school and graduating annually. A continuing challenge for the program is to increase the number of Aboriginal students applying to enter law school. It has only met its minimum target of 10 percent annually once in the past ten years. However, the law school has not limited the target and has accepted as many students as were qualified in any given year. A factor for the law school is that it must compete with all Canadian law schools for a limited number of students, and some students have gone to other institutions. With regard to admissions to the law school, there has been an overall attempt to not be limited to the traditional indicators for admission. However, the Law School Admissions Test still plays a significant role in the file review of all Aboriginal students' applications. The entire admissions process continues to be a matter of discussion for many law school institutions, and is not a matter that is easily resolved. The Academic Support Program did engage an Aboriginal person to manage the provision of support services to Aboriginal and other non-mainstream students. Recruitment of Aboriginal students is a continuing obligation of the program. However, the program has been dependent upon grants for recruiting, and various initiatives at different times have been utilized to encourage university and high-school students to attend law school. At this time, the university is attempting a new program of recruitment where all Access programs, including the Faculty of Law, have pooled resources to achieve a more sustained approach to Aboriginal student recruitment. The Faculty of Law did have a "Native People and the Law" course for a number of years previous and subsequent to the AJI's report. A new course, entitled "Aboriginal People and the Law - Land Claims," has been added in the past three years. Both courses are taught by the director of the Academic Support Program at this time. As well, a number of professors have and continue to include major components dealing with Aboriginal people and the law in their courses. A conference of all law schools, for the discussion of increasing the numbers of Aboriginal students, was held in 1991. The meeting did initiate an annual meeting of all law schools for a number of years to discuss diversity and recruitment of indigenous and non-mainstream students.
Culturally Appropriate ServicesThe Aboriginal Justice Inquiry made two recommendations related to the provision of culturally appropriate spiritual services in Manitoba correctional facilities. Specifically, the report recommended that:
The Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission has been informed that these recommendations have been acted upon. However, the Manitoba Metis Federation has communicated to the AJIC that the MMF has not been involved in any culturally appropriate programming in correctional institutions, and that the Elders and cultural workers in provincial institutions are largely First Nations people. The Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission recommends that:
Cross-Cultural TrainingThe Report of the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry stated that:
In response to this situation, the AJI recommended that cross-cultural training be provided to give non-Aboriginal people a better understanding of Aboriginal communities and cultural values. Specifically, the AJI recommended that:
The AJIC has been informed by the Manitoba government that there has been a significant increase in cross-cultural training. Manitoba Justice, the Winnipeg and Brandon police services, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police all provide cross-cultural training. In addition, the Manitoba Civil Service Commission has developed a number of cross-cultural courses available to all government employees. They include "Walk a Mile in my Moccasins", "Communicating with Aboriginal People", and "Cultural Diversity". All these programs are geared to non-Aboriginal personnel to assist them to gain a better understanding of Aboriginal peoples. These measures play an important role in ensuring that Aboriginal people who come into contact with the Manitoba justice system are treated in an appropriate manner. Secondly, they are crucial elements in any Aboriginal employment strategy, since the retention of Aboriginal employees depends in large measure on the workplace climate. The Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission recommends that:
|
|